Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steve's avatar

Howard,

While I understand the "Advocate's zeal" at wanting to use high profile people who are unlucky enough to have won/lost the prostate cancer lottery, I very strongly believe that ut is the patients right to control the dissemination of health care information about themselves.

If someone has a situation where they don't want their cancer diagnosis publicly known, it is THEIR RIGHT to decide when and where that information is shared.

Scolding someone for mot using their station in life to advance the cause of "Active Surveillance" just drives people further into the "darkness".

As a person who had childhood polio, I believed that once you had gotten over your acute polio, you had little else to worry about.

That changed in the early 1980's when researchers announced that Post Polio Syndrome was a "thing", and that I might expect that increasing disability could be a future problem.

I firmly believe that I lost a shot at a major career advancement due to my managers being afraid of the "what if".

There can be lots of reasons why people don't wish to share there health status.

If you have any doubt, just look at Trump's response to requests for such information.

Celebrate those who wish to share. Respect those who don't.

Thanks

Expand full comment
Howard Wolinsky's avatar

Andy,

Thanks for writing. And again I'm not a doctor.

Hard to tell what's going on.

Guidelines followed in UK vs, say US can be different. UK tries to avoid biopsies and also AS. (I have an upcoming story on that.)

But we don't know your Gleason score, PI-RADS score, size and number of lesions, family history and maybe genetics. What factor led to your RP? UK also is cautious in use of PSA testing--understand patients need to request it.

Howard

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts