By Howard Wolinsky
The experts say PSA screening is far from perfect.
The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test can miss high-grade cancers and can lead to biopsies leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment in low-risk cancers, pulling the trigger on aggressive treatment with risks of impotence and incontinence as potential side effects.
It’s a story we hear all too often.
Dr. Eric Klein, chair emeritus at Cleveland Clinic, said, “PSA has 95% sensitivity for grade 6 or higher cancer. It misses about 8% of high-grade cancers that don’t make PSA. [PSA’s] main limitation is its low specificity, meaning it’s frequently elevated just by BPH.”
As a result of these limitations, a new market of back-up or seconday tests has been emerging with a goal of reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies and avoiding risks that biopsies, especially transrectal biopsies can cause, such as sepsis and even death.
[Klein developed one of these tests, IsoPSA, which he tells me has been selling briskly. Typically, this new breed of tests is claimed to reduce biopsy rates by about half. Note: these tests are not intended to follow men on Active Surveillance, though I have heard of IsoPSA being used this way.]
One of the new tests that’s been in the news is the Stockholm3, developed at The Karolinska Institute in Sweden, going back to 2015.
(Dr. Hari Vigneswaran, medical director of A3P Biomedical, developer of Stockholm3.)
Hari Vigneswaran, MD, an American urologist and researcher at Karolinska, who is the medical director of A3P Biomedical, developer of Stockholm3, said the test can reduce unnecessary biopsies by 40-50%.
He told me: “Stockholm3, by design, predicts risk of significant cancer (which is Gleason 3+4 or higher). Gleason 3+3 is not of interest to be detected, thus showing its ability to reduce overdetection.”
Vigneswaran said Stockholm3 is mainly used by urologists and primary care providers in Europe. “The major benefit is in the primary care setting which can act as a rule-in test and rule-out test. In the urology setting it acts more as a rule-out test,” he said.
My sources in Sweden say that Stockholm3, despite its Swedish roots, is not widely used in its homeland and is mainly being used in a public health screening program there.
The Stockholm3 blood test combines five proteins (tPSA, PSP94, GDF15 and KLK2), germline SNPs and clinical parameters, including age, family history of prostate cancer, and earlier prostate biopsies into an algorithm to identify men facing an increased risk for prostate cancer defined as those at Grade Group 2 (Gleason 3+4) and above.
In a population-based screening, Stockholm3, with nearly 60,000 patients, compared to PSA 3 ng/ml or higher, the test avoided “benign biopsies” by 44% while maintaining 100% relative sensitivity to find high-grade prostate cancer. In a randomized, prospective study at multiple centers, with 12,750 patients, PSA plus MRI was compared with Stockholm3 plus MRI with findings showing 100% relative sensitivity in finding high-grade tumors and reduced MRIs by 36% and unnecessary biopsies by 18%.
The studies mainly looked at Scandinavian men and did not include minority men often tested in the U.S.
The test was first available in limited areas within Sweden since 2017, subsequently became CE Marked, which means it meets European health, safety, and environmental protection standards, and, thus far, has expanded to several countries outside Sweden, including Norway, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, Poland, Turkey, Spain and Canada.
Vigneswaran said the test will be available in the United States in the next two months through the BioAgilytix lab in Durham, North Carolina.
Dr. Ola Bratt, who leads the prostate cancer guidelines effort in Sweden, told me: “Stockholm3 does not help find aggressive cancers, but reduces the proportion of men with a raised PSA who require an MRI (or a systematic biopsy, if pre-biposy MRI is not standard) by one-third. And by reducing the number of men needing further investigations it reduces detection of low-grade cancer.”
Vigneswaran said, “The large majority of men have a PSA below 1.5 ng/ml and we know the risk of cancer is low in these men but we know there is significant cancer that starts at PSA above these thresholds, the challenge is to avoid overdetection and invasive procedures.
“The goal is not to replace PSA but reflex [automatically refer] to Stockholm3 from PSA values that range between 1.5 and 20 ng/ml) to aid in the detection of aggressive cancer while also reducing overtesting. This is how the test is used in Europe. It can also be used in men with elevated PSA (like >3 ng/ml or >4 ng/ml).”
He said: “In the primary care setting, there's some hesitancy with PSA testing due to conflicting guideline recommendations so it's just not done, or it's not done well. You're not getting the right men through the door in the specialist setting. In your instance, you had low-grade cancer, and we don't want to be finding those cancers. A secondary biomarker can help reduce overdetection, but we also want to make sure we're finding the men that will miss the window of cure and have a recurrence, metastatic cancer or even die from their cancer.”
Cost has been an issue in Sweden.
Dr. Mats Ahlberg, a urology researcher at Uppsala University Hospital, said Stockholm3 costs about 4,000 Swedish Crowns ($350 US) compared to a PSA costing $190 Swedish Crowns (US$17). In Sweden, Stockholm3 is being used in screening programs in Sweden called the OPT program in the Värmland and Stockholm/Gotland regions
Ahlberg maintains there is no benefit from Stockholm3 vs.PSA combined with a urologist visit.
Then, there’s an allegedconflict of interest.
Ahlberg said: “It is also well known that the researchers behind STHLM3 who promote the test and argue for its superiority, also are shareholders in A3P Biomedical A, the company that provides the STHLM3 test and risk score interpretation, which reduces their credibility somewhat.”
Vigneswaran said: “Stockholm3 was developed by researchers at Karolinska and a large body of work has been completed by them, with relevant conflicts disclosed. The data is the data; however, it is important to see validation independently. SEPTA [a recently released multiracial validation study in the U.S.] was a large step in that direction with the inclusion of a wide network of researchers. There are other independent validations, which confirm the benefits, and we hope to see more independent validations that can answer other questions and provide benefit to our patients.”
Will a test developed in Sweden with men of Scandinavian descent--which by the way is a high-risk population for prostate cancer--work on a diverse population such as in the United States?
At the recent American Society for Clinical Oncology Genitourinary Congress, Dr. Scott Eggener, of the University of Chicago, presented the SEPTA study of 2,129 biopsied men--most of whom have raised PSAs-- on whether Stockholm3 works in Black, Hispanic, and Asian men as well as whites. It does. Overall, 55% of participants were identified as being in racial/ethnic minorities.
Compared to PSA, Stockholm3 would have reduced benign and grade 1 biopsies by 45% overall, 53% in Hispanic patients, 46% in Black and Asian patients, and 42% in white patients, Eggener found.
“The use of Stockholm3 has the potential to reduce unnecessary harms of prostate cancer screening,” Eggener noted.
Vigneswaran said this study used the existing commercial product.
He said the federalCLIA(Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments)-licensed BioAgilytix lab will supply the LDT (lab-developed test) for the U.S. because in-vitro diagnostic tests do not require approval by the Food and Drug Administration.
He said a price has not been established. But the test goes for $300 to $500 in Europe.
Vigneswaran stressed Stockholm 3 will not replace PSAs but patient and physician workflow is optimized when it is a “reflex test,” which can be automatically ordered if a PSA is above a predetermined level.
More to come.
Question: I have heard about urologic oncologists and urologists. What’s the difference anyway?
Dr. Leapman answers:
What is a urologist? A urologist is a physician who specializes in the treatment of conditions of the genitourinary tract. This includes kidney stones, bladder issues, prostate conditions, male infertility, erectile dysfunction, testicular problems (cancer, torsion), sexually transmitted diseases, urologic cancers (prostate, bladder, kidney, testicular, penile), pediatric urology, and incontinence. Many urologists diagnose and treat prostate cancer.
What is a urologic oncologist? Urologists who specialize in the management of urologic cancers. These include prostate, bladder, kidney, testicular, and penile cancer. All urologic oncologists have completed training in urology and may be comfortable handling “general urology” issues, particularly as they overlap with the treatment of urologic cancers.
[Note: There also are other types of oncologists:
—Medical oncologists, who take care of cancer patients by using approaches like chemotherapy, hormone therapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy. These specialists typically don’t care for men with low-risk prostate cancer.
—Radiation oncologists are doctors specializing in treating cancer with radiation therapy.]
Michael S. Leapman, MD, MHS. is a urologic oncologist and an associate professor of urology and clinical program leader at the Prostate & Urologic Cancers Program, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven. He has a special interest in low-risk prostate cancer, Active Surveillance, nerve-sparing robotic prostatectomy, focal therapy, high-risk disease, molecular imaging, and PSMA PET scans. Send Dr. Leapman questions on Active Surveillance at mailto:pros8canswers@gmail.com Or cut and paste: pros8canswers@gmail.com
Don’t forget the virtual AS session at the ZERO Summit
By Howard Wolinsky
For the past three years, I have run a special virtual Active Surveillance support group for ZERO Prostate Cancer.
Join us at 11 a.m.-12 p.m. Eastern on Tuesday, March 12, 2024. Register:
https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZUsfuqgrjIoG9AWf7voMhzT_UjdqbQQbQPA
My stalwart AS support colleagues Jim Schraidt, a ZERO board member and from AnCan, and Hugh Idstein and Garry Tosca from AnCan, will be on deck at this popular session.
The ABCs of BPH
By Howard Wolinsky
King Charles III’s recent treatment for BPH (benign prostatic hyperplasia), or an enlarged prostate, has put a spotlight on this common problem in men as they age.
Active Surveillance Patients International will devote its next webinar, entitled “The ABCs of BPH,” from noon-1:30 p.m. Eastern on Saturday, March 30. Register here: https://zoom.us/meeting/register/tJYoduChrzIrH9dHBNZXqD_pOUCG85yv_KQF
The National Health Service in the UK said that tens of thousands of British men were motivated to check out the NHS website regarding the prostate.
BPH is a common problem in men as they age—unrelated to prostate cancer, BTW.
By age 60, half of men will have signs of BPH, according to the Cleveland Clinic. By age 85, 90% will have symptoms of the condition.
The program will feature a video by UMichigan’s Dr. Casey Dauw, “BPH Treatments: HOLEP, PAE, Surgical TURPS & More” produced by the Prostate Cancer Research Institute. ASPI board members will share their personal experiences with BPH followed by an audience discussion
Steve, If only it were true.
Back when I covered medicine for the Chicago Sun-Times, I made a point, when relevant, of costs. Turns out to be hard to get that data. Fortunately, here it was available immediately.
Howard
"You do no wrong", Howard, Hippocratic Oath of medical science journalists! So nice to see costs included for tests; would hope such a main stay going forward no matter the forum. To you health!