Howard, when and where will taping of AS25 be available? Who holds the "keys" to purchase of such? Why is such not used as a tool in marketing among treating teams; under what circumstances is such available? Prostate Cancer research Institute has for years done no less.
Well, paid subscribers in a meeting afterward said they would recommend I share the video. I may need to edit the video a little. Or should I oput it would raw,
I need to do some articles based on the tape and then I will make it available at no cost initially to those who registered and subsequently will make it available to Youtube audience. So next could of weeks. PCRI has a video team. In my casem my sons might help me.
Howard, yet to read this edition of blog. Hasten to comment because of "incredible gift" AS25 was to "handful" of those in attendance this morning. Message I took home is twofold: First, patient's ability to "require" understanding of pathological report, especially what is not in findings of treating team; Equally, personal need to learn how to "sell value" appearing at such webinars, especially this one. Argued for an hour with individual to appear with questions addressed today. He is not "sold" on need for ADT, hence reason for protocol suggested by numerous "2nd opinions." We are consumers, treated as consumers, and as such need to know what questions to ask, immediately, to counter jaundice some men experience with doctors. This individual expects an understanding of limits tools used to form an opinion, anything less he'll "freelance", possibly to his detriment. I suspect he is not alone.
If you attended the webinar the session: Please fill out the evaluation form.
https://forms.gle/iq9iVAMT8UTiwd4t5 t
Thanks. Steve.
I would urge the person undergo, if he hasn't already, the Artera AI test, which rules out the 60% of patients who are not good candidates for ADT.
Howard, when and where will taping of AS25 be available? Who holds the "keys" to purchase of such? Why is such not used as a tool in marketing among treating teams; under what circumstances is such available? Prostate Cancer research Institute has for years done no less.
Well, paid subscribers in a meeting afterward said they would recommend I share the video. I may need to edit the video a little. Or should I oput it would raw,
I need to do some articles based on the tape and then I will make it available at no cost initially to those who registered and subsequently will make it available to Youtube audience. So next could of weeks. PCRI has a video team. In my casem my sons might help me.
Hell, PCRI has a video studio.
Howard, yet to read this edition of blog. Hasten to comment because of "incredible gift" AS25 was to "handful" of those in attendance this morning. Message I took home is twofold: First, patient's ability to "require" understanding of pathological report, especially what is not in findings of treating team; Equally, personal need to learn how to "sell value" appearing at such webinars, especially this one. Argued for an hour with individual to appear with questions addressed today. He is not "sold" on need for ADT, hence reason for protocol suggested by numerous "2nd opinions." We are consumers, treated as consumers, and as such need to know what questions to ask, immediately, to counter jaundice some men experience with doctors. This individual expects an understanding of limits tools used to form an opinion, anything less he'll "freelance", possibly to his detriment. I suspect he is not alone.
Thanks, Keith. Happy New Year. Howard
PS Watch for Part II and then my pick of the prostate news story of the year,. What do you think it'll be?
Great article Howard!