8 Comments
author

Thanks, Keith.

You're right about resistance to change. "i've mentioned that in previous stories,

And thanks forthe point about antibiotics.

Howard

Expand full comment
author

John,

Can you shrewhat happened in 2008.

Hope you're OK.

HW

Expand full comment

#1 reason TP is lagging in the U.S. is that people (in this case, doctors) don't like change. #2 $$$ as detailed in the article. #3 Would require training of 1000s of Urologists. And sadly, most U.S. physicians don't care about antibiotic stewardship. I review charts as part of my job and most antibiotics are prescribed inappropriately in an outpatient setting.

Expand full comment

TR at WashU/Barnes, 2008. Sepsis. Almost died. Never again.

Expand full comment
author

Who says prostate cancer isn't funny. Just think of the digital rectal exam ...

And now what's funny about, sepsis, antibiotics and "superbugs"?

Not much. Just look hard enough and a prostate cancer patient will find an angle.

An anonymous Gleason 6 jokester, a winner of the Glee in Gleason Score prostate humor contest, submitted this bit of infectious levity:

"Did you hear the one about the AS patient who was given antibiotic pills before his TR? Didn’t work, they kept falling out!"

HW

(Translations available for the uninitiated for TR and AS.)

Expand full comment

Just as I thought. RCT?! Like comparing apples and oranges, or should I say pumpkins and toasters.

Expand full comment

Seems to me the antibiotics stewardship issue should be front and center, not buried in the discussion. Do the studies that compare TR favorably with TP do so only because of prophylactic antibiotics? Are biopsies killing not just the people being biopsied? One leading urologist told me he was proud of his TR safety record. Are American urologists proud of the squandering of antibiotics? This is a genuine "moral hazard" issue. – Peter Swenson

Expand full comment